Migration securitisation, border control, xenophobia, Immigration Act, Refugees Act, deportation, detention, asylum seekers, undocumented migrants, Border Management Authority, Operation Fiela, national security, migration policy, threat perception, Department of Home Affairs, xenophobic violence, spatial control, migration management, illegal foreigners, border enforcement, immigration policing, African migrants, social exclusion, sovereignty, foreign nationals, biometric identification, militarized borders, criminalization of migration, migration control, refugee reception offices, mobility control, nation-state, social cohesion, exclusionary practices, state sovereignty, scapegoating, state violence, migration governance, refugee protection, documentation challenges, spatial segregation, forced removals, constitutional rights, human security, regional integration, SADC, identity documents, regularization, smart borders, migration law enforcement, anti-immigrant sentiment, othering, state talk, refugee status determination, migrant labor, apartheid legacy, freedom of movement, integration policy, state of exception, law enforcement, corruption, informal settlements, migration discourse, illegal immigration, Lindela Detention Centre, state capacity, humanitarian protection, service delivery, labor migration, population control, migrant rights, citizenship

The Securitisation of Migration Governance in South Africa

Leave a Comment / African Migration Governance, Securitisation of Migration Governance /

South Africa and Securitisation of Migration Governance South Africa has become a significant destination for migrants from across Africa and beyond since its transition to democracy in 1994. As one of the continent’s most developed economies, it has attracted people seeking better economic opportunities, as well as those fleeing political instability and conflict. However, the […]

The Securitisation of Migration Governance in South Africa Read More »