South Africa, food security, non-citizens, migrants, refugees, asylum seekers, undocumented migrants, social assistance, social grants, food aid, humanitarian principles, human rights, constitutional rights, section 27, Khosa case, exclusion, policy gaps, public health, nutrition, malnutrition, child nutrition, gender, intersectionality, vulnerability, informal economy, urban migrants, Johannesburg, Cape Town, Durban, migrant households, social protection, community organizations, NGOs, urban agriculture, informal food trade, ethical implications, social cohesion, xenophobia, migration policy, government policy, social relief, SRD grant, food insecurity, dietary diversity, poverty, inequality, access to food, civil society, legal obligations, international law, human dignity, program implementation, policy reform, inclusive food systems, migrant resilience, emergency food relief, research gaps, evidence-based solutions, actionable recommendations.

What Are the Ethical and Policy Implications of Excluding Non-Citizens from Food Security Interventions in South Africa?

Leave a Comment / African Migrants, African Migration, African Migration Governance, Migrant Nutrition /

Excluding Non‑Citizens from Food Security in South Africa: Ethics and Policy Opening — A Case of Silent Hunger In late 2023, a family of Zimbabwean migrants living in a Johannesburg township reached out to a local NGO. The mother described how, after losing her informal‑sector job, her children went hungry for days because food parcels […]

What Are the Ethical and Policy Implications of Excluding Non-Citizens from Food Security Interventions in South Africa? Read More »